Why Fox should let 'Wayward Pines' die after one season | New York Post

Spoiler alert: Don't read on if you didn't watch Thursday's finale of "Wayward Pines." The entire time I watched Fox's "Wayward Pines," M. Knight Shyamalan's first entry into television, I was waiting for the other shoe to drop.

The quirky, offbeat limited series, “Wayward Pines” (Women 18-34: 0.9/4; Men 18-34: 0.8/4; Women 18-49: 1.3/5; Men 18-49: 1.2/5) experience ratings gains for its season (or series) finale, rising 22 percent in total viewers and up 33 percent among

Thursday's so-called "series finale" of M. Night Shyamalan's "Wayward Pines" proved why broadcast television still doesn't understand how to replicate successfu.

Describing Fox's “Wayward Pines” to the uninitiated is like taking part in a pitch meeting that never ends: “It's 'Twin Peaks' meets 'The Twilight Zone' meets 'The Truman Show' meets 'Lost'…” To that list of titles, you could add 

An eerie flash-forward prologue, in which Ethan drags Kate to the reckoning stage and holds a knife to her throat, kicks off Wayward Pines' penultimate episode. By now, it's difficult to believe that Ethan would actually go through with executing Kate